YMA's Submission to the Australian Broadcasting Authority's Review
of the Australian Content Standard
YOUNG MEDIA AUSTRALIA
PO Box 7130 Hutt St Adelaide SA 5000
www.youngmedia.org.au; email info@youngmedia.org.au
Phone 08 8232 1577; Fax 08 8232 1571
[note: see current contact details
for up to date address etc]
Preliminary submission to the Australian Broadcasting Authoritys
review of the Australian Content Standard. Feb 2002
Contents
1. Introduction
2. YMA standpoint for this paper
3. Issues raised by this review

1. Introduction
Young Media Australia welcomes this opportunity to provide a submission
to the Australian Broadcasting Authoritys Review of the Australian
Content Standard.
YMA is a not-for-profit national community organisation formed
in 1957.
Mission Statement: Young Media Australia (YMA) exists to promote
a quality media environment for Australian children, and to raise
community awareness of the needs of children and young people in
relation to print, electronic and screen based media.
Who we Are: YMA is Australias only national advocacy organisation
representing the interests of children and young people in relation
to print, electronic and screen based media.
What we do: YMA collects and disseminates information, conducts
research, and provides advice, education and training on the impact
of print, electronic and screen based media on children and young
people.
How we do it: YMA represents community concerns about the impact
of print, electronic and screen based media on children and young
people to legislators, regulators and the media.
YMA bases this submission on consultation with its national membership
(which includes the major child focussed organisations in Australia),
and on its Guidelines on Childrens Media (which include support
for the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, with particular
reference to Article 13, and Article 17, and also the Childrens
TV Charter, viz Children should hear, see and express themselves,
their culture, their languages and their life experiences, through
television programs which affirm their sense of self, community
and place).

2. Young Media Australias submission
is made from the following standpoint:
2.1 Australian children need and deserve to see their own culture
portrayed on television. They should be able to see Australian faces
and places, and to hear Australian voices.
2.2 Australian children should be provided with Australian material
that is made specifically for them, and which deals with their issues
and interests in a way that enhances their development.
2.3 Australian children should have access to the same diverse
range of program types that adults do. Childrens programming should
not be considered as a single type of programming among many provided
by licensees. Drama made specifically for children should always
be a significant part of the diversity of program type required
to be provided for children.
2.4 Access to quality story telling is an important contributor
to childrens development. Quality drama programs will enhance childrens
development by positive stimulation of their imaginations, and by
expanding their understanding and appreciation of the world in a
beneficial way, including promoting non-violent strategies to conflict.
2.5 Australian children should have easy access to such material.
Easy access can be equated with consistent and appropriate time
slots, and by sufficient promotion to enable the material to be
found.
2.6 The Objectives and Section 122 of the Broadcasting Services
Act support the above standpoint in relation to children.
2.7 It is apparent over many years that the commercial TV industry
is unwilling to provide such quotas of quality drama made for children
without the encouragement of regulation. Such regulation and in
particular, the Australian Content Standard should remain in force,
and be strengthened to make the outcome for the child audience more
effective.
2.8 The commercial free to air TV industry must continue to provide
such material. The task cannot be left solely to the ABC, if children
are to have easy access to a diversity of programs and dramas at
a suitable age level.
Nor should the supply of programs to children be left to Pay TV
(the let them eat cable syndrome). As FACTS CEO Julie Flynn says
in The Australian (7/2/02 Letters), on the most recent figures 75
to 80 percent of viewers choose not to pay to watch TV. Those who
choose not to, or who cannot afford Pay TV should not be disenfranchised.
2.9 The maintenance of the Australian Content Standard is also
vital for the development and growth of the Australian childrens
drama and other program type production industry. The production
of quality relevant programs for children that enhance their development
is a specialist job, requiring a high level of skill and experience.
Without regulation and the continuation of a market for childrens
programs, many experienced people will be lost, and the ability
to produce quality material considerably diminished. The child viewer
will be the loser.

3. Comment on issues related to the Childrens
drama subquota
YMA requests that comments made as part of section 2 above (YMAs
standpoint) be taken into account in the ABAs consideration of the
Childrens drama subquota.
In addition YMA makes the following comments on the issues raised
in Chapter 4 of the Issues Paper.
3.1 Overview of the Quota
YMA supports the philosophy behind the existing Childrens Television
Standards and Australian Childrens TV Drama quota.
YMA recognises the industrys continuing reluctance to maintain
the Childrens Drama quota, but cannot see why the industry should
be excused from its public service obligations to the child audience.
Access to quality Australian childrens drama is important in the
development of Australian childrens cultural identity. Australian
childrens drama is popular with children, and is part of the diversity
of program type that they should have access to.
YMA recommends that the present level of Australian Content for
C Drama, C and P programs continue, if not increased.
3.2 Importance of overseas markets
YMA believes that while overseas involvement may be necessary in
the production of Australian Childrens drama, the CTS criteria and
Australian content standard must continue to limit foreignness in
these programs.
YMA opposes the inclusion in the drama quota, of programs, which
for financial reasons, are, in reality, little more than advertising
vehicles for related toys.
3.3 The $45,000 minimum licence fee
The present minimum for licence fees for Australian Childrens drama
of $45000 seems not to be working well.
YMA recommends that the minimum licence fee should be raised to
at least the minimum required by the FFC as amended from time to
time .
3.4 Diversity of drama format
YMA supports suggestions that might result in a greater diversity
in format within the C drama quota.
Further, YMA believes that there is a need for at least some part
of the drama quota to be directed at the younger end of the 6-12
age range, viz the 6-10year olds, who are still, in interests and
development, children, whereas their older siblings may have moved
on to other more adolescent interests.
3.5 Reaching the child audience
Children love drama, and especially Australian drama (see 20years
of C programs research). The networks have consistently failed their
child audience by not giving them proper access to their C drama
programs.
Networks have done this by failing to promote their C drama series,
and have provided irregular and incomplete scheduling of series.
They have failed to program drama series in timeslots that suit
the child audience.
However, the networks, having bought Australian Childrens drama,
do repeat it often showing that they consider that the product will
rate with the audience.
YMA notes that the networks seem not to have taken up the opportunity
offered in earlier revisions of the Australian Content Quota, viz,
to screen an extra minute of advertising in C dramas if they are
screened in prime time.
YMA recommends the use of regulation to require that the networks
properly promote their programs on air, and schedule series in consistent
timeslots and ensure that the series is completed. Such regulation
is necessary to ensure that children know about and have access
to their programs.
IN CONCLUSION
YMA will be developing these points and issues further in the next
few weeks, and will lodge its final submission then. YMA would welcome
the opportunity to discuss these issues further with the ABA, especially
in a public hearing.
Barbara Biggins OAM
President
2002

|